| PDFedit | Bugtracker |
| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 05-19-2013 15:50 CEST |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Docs |
| Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
| 0000312 | [GUI] =Other (GUI)= | minor | unable to reproduce | 04-03-09 05:07 | 05-03-10 21:23 | ||||
| Reporter | Alister | View Status | public | ||||||
| Assigned To | misuj1am | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | duplicate | ||||||
| Status | resolved | ||||||||
| Summary | 0000312: n's displayed as y's in Adobe Reader | ||||||||
| Description |
I inserted a page into a pdf, saved a session, inserted another page and saved another session, and now although it displays correctly in Pdfedit, in both Adobe Reader 8 and Acrobat 6 Standard, all the n's on the first page I inserted are changed to y's, and all the instances of "Report" on that page are changed to "Re port". I haven't tried very hard to reproduce, but I can if it would be helpful. |
||||||||
| Additional Information | |||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
Relationships |
|||||||
|
|||||||
Notes |
|
|
(0000786) Alister 04-03-09 05:36 |
Wait... I can always reproduce it. I've uploaded the source files now. If I start with 2.pdf, add 1.pdf, then 3.pdf, the first page is displayed wrong. If I add 3.pdf then 1.pdf it is displayed OK. I think there is something about 3.pdf that pdfedit doesn't handle quite right. BTW I've only tried the page order 1,2,3 |
|
(0000789) hockm0bm 04-03-09 09:27 |
Thanks for report, I will try to look at it as soon as I am done with other issues. |
|
(0000799) hockm0bm 05-14-09 11:34 |
Hi, sorry for such a long time without any response, but I was busy with another stuff. I am not sure I have understood your reproduction steps. What I have tried is the following: * open 2.pdf * insert all pages (3) from 1.pdf (before the first page in the original document) * insert one page from 3.pdf (also at the beginning) * save * open in acrobat reader and everything seems to be OK. (first page is a map, then 3 pages of Apendix - B, C, D and tables on the last 2 pages). I haven't observed neither any n->y nor "Re port". Are my reproduction steps correct? |
|
(0000809) Alister 05-15-09 05:46 |
> * insert one page from 3.pdf (also at the beginning) No; it only happened if I inserted 3.pdf at the end. But I can't reproduce it now anyway. The only possible reasons I can think of are: - a change in my Windows or my Cygwin environment or the pdfedit setup (I have definitely changed pdfedit settings). - a broken file got fixed by uploading it here (that seems pretty unlikely). |
|
(0000810) Alister 05-15-09 05:58 |
Have you looked at "Appendix B.pdf"? It still displays incorrectly for me in Adobe Reader, but correctly in pdfedit, so maybe we can figure out why... |
|
(0000811) Alister 05-15-09 06:15 |
FWIW it also displays incorrectly in GSview, AutoCAD and PDFfill, but correctly in Okular and foxit reader :) |
|
(0000825) hockm0bm 05-18-09 14:45 |
I have looked closer to the document and it seems that the problem is caused by any change done to the page inserted from document 1.pdf (this one is inserted to the Appendix B.pdf). If you save revision 1 from Appendix B.pdf and display it in acrobat reader then you get proper result. However, when you try to do any change to the 1st page then you get n->y problem. I have tried to modify the original 1.pdf document and there is the very same result. Each modified page (I have drawn a line on the 1st and 3rd page) is affected while the untouched one is correct. One thing which is not clear to me is that whenever we do some modification to the page the original content stream is not touched and we simply add another content stream (Is this right, Jozo?). But if this is true then how could we result in different rendering? |
|
(0000826) hockm0bm 05-18-09 14:55 |
I have just noticed that [7 0] (original content stream of the page 1 - 1.pdf) is changed after I have added an arrow to the page 1 [*]. The arrow itself is represented as a separate content stream though. The page refers both content streams via /Contents. Why is the original stream changed? Original document (page 1): [4 0]: << /Type /Page /Contents 7 0 R /Parent 2 0 R /Resources << /ExtGState 8 0 R /XObject 9 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /ImageC /Text ] /Font 10 0 R >> /Rotate 0 /MediaBox [ 0 0 595 842 ] >> Changed document (page 1): [4 0]: << /Type /Page /Contents [ 7 0 R 26 0 R ] /Parent 2 0 R /Resources << /ExtGState 8 0 R /XObject 9 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /ImageC /Text ] /Font 10 0 R >> /Rotate 0 /MediaBox [ 0 0 595 842 ] /CropBox [ 0 0 595 842 ] >> [*] Here is the xref table for the changed document () xref 4 1 0000027988 00000 n 7 1 0000028218 00000 n 26 1 0000030055 00000 n trailer |
|
(0000827) hockm0bm 05-18-09 14:58 |
7_0.orig original content stream 7_0.changed content stream from the changed page I have tried to compare them, but formating seems to be different, so I couldn't see much from it. |
|
(0000835) Alister 05-20-09 07:09 edited on: 05-20-09 07:17 |
I've got another pdf with a similar problem in an inserted page (now running cvs from a few days ago). Every o on the page has been changed to r, and the one h in the title has been changed to d. Unfortunately I'm getting the same error (freezing the browser) trying to upload it, even though it is well under the 8MB limit and I haven't zipped it or anything. Do you want me to send you it as well (and the original files)? Application error 401 Database query failed. Error received from database was 1153: Got a packet bigger than 'max_allowed_packet' for the query: INSERT INTO mantis_bug_file_table (bug_id, title, description, diskfile, filename, folder, filesize, file_type, date_added, content) VALUES (312, ", ", 'db74fca05d17db08f7bc... |
|
(0000836) Alister 05-20-09 07:14 |
FWIW this latest pdf came from MS Word 2003, via pdf995. The affected page in the last example also came from Word, I think via PDFill's pdf printer (but I'm not sure - it could have also been pdf995). I think both these pdf printers use Ghostscript. |
|
(0000838) Alister 05-20-09 08:15 |
Also, I tried flattening it, just to see what would happen, and it still displays correctly in pdfedit and incorrectly in Adobe Reader. |
|
(0000839) hockm0bm 05-20-09 09:13 |
> Do you want me to send you it as well (and the original files)? Yes, please. |
|
(0000840) Alister 05-20-09 09:28 |
OK, you should receive them soon. > Unfortunately I'm getting the same error Sorry if I confused any one... the same error as I mentioned in http://pdfedit.petricek.net/bt/view.php?id=313 [^] |
|
(0000891) misuj1am 07-13-09 00:44 |
as this needs GUI, waiting for q4 again |
|
(0000936) misuj1am 08-13-09 02:02 edited on: 08-13-09 02:02 |
i created content stream text files (1,2) on win32 and there is a clear difference. michal, if you have time, can you look why manipulating pages changes also content stream? |
|
(0000955) hockm0bm 08-20-09 13:02 |
> michal, if you have time, can you look why manipulating pages changes also content stream? I am not sure what you mean... Something like http://pdfedit.petricek.net/bt/view.php?id=328? [^] |
|
(0001062) hockm0bm 05-03-10 21:23 |
We believe that this is the same problem as bt#348 which has a fix in the CVS. |